Pragmatic enterprise architecture framework – PEAF

I attended an interesting and thought provoking training course last week run by PEAF’s founder Kevin Smith.

PEAF’s mantra is “cutting EA to the bone” – with a focus on:

  • filling the gap between minimal EA frameworks that do not provide guidance on how ‘to do’ EA and those that are difficult to use/understand.
  • looking at all areas of the enterprise – not just IT/technical areas.

During the week two core concepts particularly resonated with me:

  • “Enterprise debt” – the debt incurred by organisations when projects do not comply with core architecutural principles. This particularly hit home as I have blogged previously about a related concept – ‘data quality debt’.
  • “Yes, but….”. The role of an architect is to help an organisation make better informed decisions. An architect should provide information on the implications of a particular idea/project, and if required, ensure that senior management are aware of these. An architect’s role is not to act as a gatekeeper – to say “Yes, but….” rather than “No”

If you are starting to look into EA or evaluating different frameworks then it is defnitely worth taking a look at what PEAF can offer.
 

Advertisements

One Response to Pragmatic enterprise architecture framework – PEAF

  1. […] it relates back to the standard question of ‘tactical vs. strategic’. This is where PEAF’s enterprise debt concept is really useful for framing this type of […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: